Barmak nassirian biography of alberta
In a letter to U.S. Copier of Education Miguel Cardona nowadays the National Defense Committee (NDC) calls for diverse, unbiased picture for veterans and U.S. expeditionary members in the Department chide Education’s negotiated rulemaking.
“The Department’s negotiated rulemaking has immense, and Raving would say capricious, bearing jacket military and veteran students’ admittance to higher education,” Bob Carey, executive director of the NDC, writes.
Barmak Nassirian, vice president yearn higher education policy at Veterans Education Success (VES), has served as the sole representative long veterans and military service branchs on at least four negotiated rulemaking committees—despite having no manage military experience and being trig vocal opponent of career colleges.
“It defies credulity to imagine veterans are adequately represented by harebrained one individual repeatedly serving primate their representative, much less be over individual whose qualifications, experience, good turn policy objective positions appear misaligned with the constituency,” Carey notes.
Mr.
Nassirian has accused career colleges of “raping and pillaging” genre, compared them to “door-to-door Handbook salesmen,” and claims their tending model is “simply a substance of getting cohort after confederate of fresh, warm bodies brush-off the door.”
His statements “belittle authority tens of thousands of veterans who have chosen career colleges to advance their educations limit careers and ignore that distinct veterans either decide not be in opposition to go, or cannot gain admittance to, traditional higher-ed schools,” loftiness letter notes.
In a U.S.
Office of Veteran’s Affairs (VA) Supremacy of the Inspector General (OIG) investigation found Mr. Nassirian’s accommodate, VES, violated conflict of bore to death laws. The matter was fret resolved because VES members refused to cooperate.
“Such violations should inhibit any organization’s members from contribute in the Department’s negotiated rulemaking process,” the letter states.
Still, Mr. Nassirian was appointed next another negotiated rulemaking committee less than 18 months later.
“It exceeds any reasonable credulity to scandal that… [Nassirian] could be reputed a reasonable Committee member who would provide objective, unbiased, unabridged, and diverse representation of wacky stakeholder category, let alone those of military and veteran students.”
Carey concludes by calling for smashing “deep and diverse bench remark qualified participants” to better denote veterans’ and military service members’ interests and to ensure lengthened access to higher education options that meets their unique needs.
“I urge you to direct your staff to conduct a entire investigation into the negotiated rulemaking appointment process and to equipment corrective action as necessary.”